Comparisons
Drying oven
Joule Effect
Induced current
energy
consumption
windings
protection
lamination
protection
process
investments
manufacturing
process
materials
cost
work in
progress
- Compared to a drying oven process
- Work-in-progress is reduced
- 25 times with Joule Effet polymerization
- and 5 times with Induced Current
- Work-in-progress is reduced
- Joule Effect Polymerization and Induced Current
- are very low energy consumers
- In spite of many advantages the thermo-setting wires
- have a cost overrun included between 10 and 40 %
- The speed of Joule Effet and of induced Current processes
- is the main strong point
- when comparing to classical drying oven processes
- is the main strong point
- The processes investments
- for Joule Effect and Induced Current heating
- are from 3 to 5 times cheaper
- than classical drying oven processes investments
- for Joule Effect and Induced Current heating
- The use of Thermo-setting bonding wires doesn't provide lamination protection
- Joule Effect polymerization and Induced Current
- provide an optlmal windings protection
energy
consumption
windings
protection
lamination
protection
process
investments
manufacturing
process
100%
11%
20%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
20%
30%
100%
4%
20%
100%
110% à 140%
100%
100%
4%
20%
materials
cost
work in
progress
energy
consumption
windings
protection
lamination
protection
process
investments
manufacturing
process
materials
cost
work in
progress
windings
protection
lamination
protection
process
investments
manufacturing
process
materials
cost
work in
progress
energy
consumption
About AMR
Joule Effect Polymerization
Direct Induction
AMR machines
Bench tests for motors
Windings repairs
Comparisons
Infos miscellanious
this page in french
home page